← To list

pepeCoin (Wormhole) pepecoin

solana Meme coin
Contract address
EXJvx3KksbWP9QmPmtRr8mkQXD2kZrFRENCJitMs1eZ6 EXJvx3Kk…Ms1eZ6
C
47% Estimated scam risk (uncalibrated)
Caution
Assessed 2026-10-15 22:42 KST · Rule-based score uncalibrated estimate · version 0.3.0 ⓘ
Observation coverage
100%13/13 checks
The share of indicators we could check — not a safety score
We checked a broad set of core on-chain indicators. Unchecked indicators are neither risky nor safe.

Of the 43,843 tokens we have inspected, 22% score a higher risk than this coin. — This is a relative position within the sample we inspected, which was built by deliberately hunting scams and rugs, so it is not a general market distribution. A ranking is not a statement of safety.

This assessment is an uncalibrated estimate of fraud patterns — not a price or investment judgment. Request a correction

Contract safety

2 signals · +40%p
Mintable — supply can be diluted without limit
Go to evidence below ↓

Liquidity / market

1 signal · +17%p
Liquidity (LP) not locked — rug pull possible
Go to evidence below ↓

Holder distribution

No signals
No risk signals fired among the checked indicators
Go to evidence below ↓

Project / dev

No signals
No risk signals fired among the checked indicators
Go to evidence below ↓

Identity / impersonation

No signals
No risk signals fired among the checked indicators
Go to evidence below ↓

Axis cards show where signals are, not a per-axis score — the %p contribution is a simple sum, while the actual combine uses diminishing returns (overlaps add less).

Sellability — Sellable as currently observed — but this is not a safety guarantee

This only means no sell-block signals were observed at inspection time. 2 indicator(s) remain unverified, and upgrades or owner actions can change the state at any time.

Check item by item →

Observation history (22 observations · 07/10 ~ 10/15 · source: our own observation snapshots)

Liquidity $6 → $6 -5.7%
Holders 668 → 664 -0.6%

Score history (days with a score in the last 90 days: 13 · dates in KST)

The last public score computed each day.

2026-07-24 ~ 2026-10-15 Latest 47%
2026-07-24vertical axis 0–100% · middle line 50%2026-10-15
Values by date
Date (KST)Public score
2026-10-1547%
2026-10-0947%
2026-10-0547%
2026-10-0347%
2026-09-0947%
2026-09-0547%
2026-08-3047%
2026-08-1259%
2026-08-1159%
2026-08-0959%
2026-07-2659%
2026-07-2564%
2026-07-2464%

This Meme coin has an estimated scam risk of about 47% (grade C). The main risk signals include Mintable, Liquidity (LP) not locked, Ownership not renounced. 4 positive signals were also found. This is an uncalibrated estimate and not investment advice.

How this score was produced

  • Risk signals combined (diminishing returns): 47% (overlapping signals add less and less)
  • = Final 47% (the larger of the two, capped at 100% · weights are set by the operator and tested on past cases before any change)

Collection & verification method →

Risk signals (probability contribution)

HIGH Mintable — supply can be diluted without limit +28

The operator can mint additional tokens, inflating the supply without limit and diluting the value you hold.

In projects that keep distributing rewards or airdrops, this is a common design. Even so, the fact that the privilege exists is unchanged, and the risk does not disappear.

MEDIUM Ownership not renounced — owner powers remain (Mint authority BCD75RNBHrJJpW4dXVagL5mPjzRLnVZq4YirJdjEYMV7) +12

Owner powers are still active, so the owner-only functions listed above can actually be exercised.

In projects that keep distributing rewards or airdrops, this is a common design. Even so, the fact that the privilege exists is unchanged, and the risk does not disappear.

HIGH Liquidity (LP) not locked — rug pull possible (Locked 0.0%) +17

The liquidity (LP) is not locked, so the operator can pull the liquidity in a rug pull.

Positive signals (Green Flags)

These are observed facts, not approvals — appearing on a listing or data service means a profile exists there, not that anyone vetted the project.

GOOD Sells work normally (not a honeypot)

A static check found no sell-blocking configuration. This reflects a code/configuration check, not an actual trade run — cross-checking via a real sell simulation is shown separately as the 'second-source cross-check' item.

GOOD No blacklist function

There is no function to arbitrarily block specific wallets from trading.

GOOD Holders are well distributed (Max holding 10.6%)

No single wallet monopolizes the supply, so the risk of a single dump is small.

However, this metric looks only at the single largest wallet — one party splitting holdings across several wallets lowers each share and can look distributed.

GOOD Listed on a major tracking service

A profile for this token exists on major coin-data services. Being listed is not being vetted and is not evidence of safety — it does not mean anyone reviewed or approved the project, and widely listed coins have collapsed before.

Web reputation & whitepaper check (optional · about 10s)

The score above is based on on-chain indicators. This button searches the public web now for scam allegations and whitepaper content (no re-run of the on-chain check). Web search is paid and slow, so we do not run it automatically on every token — only manually when needed. Once run, the result is saved and shown automatically from then on. Web allegations are not conclusions, so verify them directly.

Project info (dev & social)

Categories: Gaming (GameFi), NFT, Solana Ecosystem, Meme, Ethereum Ecosystem

Profile as of 2026-08-30 — the dev/social figures above were observed at that time and may differ now. (Stale figures are not used in the risk verdict.)

Powered by CoinGecko

Community rating (for reference · not in the score)

Loading

This estimate is as of the assessment time — a token's state can change at any moment · Method · Grade criteria