⚠ Security incident history
-
Hack
A hack incident on a protocol linked to this token was reported on 2022-11-02.
· scale ~$1,260,000
Original external record: “Save” -
Hack
A hack incident on a protocol linked to this token was reported on 2022-11-01.
· scale ~$1,026,000
Original external record: “Save”
Cross-checked against external security-incident records — factual information separate from the score. Being harmed by a hack can differ from wrongdoing by the project. External records as of 2026-08-20.
Save Finance SAVE
SAVEaeeqeXNKYb4Lyx28DkUms5gyZ76vGa6fCfdzWfK📊 Of the 23,940 tokens we have inspected, 6% score a higher risk than this coin. — This is a relative position within the sample we inspected, which was built by deliberately hunting scams and rugs, so it is not a general market distribution. A ranking is not a statement of safety.
This assessment is an uncalibrated estimate of fraud patterns — not a price or investment judgment.
Contract safety
⚠ 3 signals · +62%pLiquidity / market
⚠ 1 signal · +35%pHolder distribution
✓ No signalsIdentity / impersonation
✓ No signalsAxis cards show where signals are, not a per-axis score — the %p contribution is a simple sum, while the actual combine uses diminishing returns (overlaps add less).
Mechanisms an owner could use to block sells — transfer pause, blacklist, cooldown — were found. It can turn into a honeypot at any time.
Observation history (60 observations · 07/27 ~ 08/21 · source: our own observation snapshots)
This General token has an estimated scam risk of about 68% (grade D). The main risk signals include Liquidity (LP) not locked, Mintable, Blacklist function. 2 positive signals were also found. This is an uncalibrated estimate and not investment advice.
How this score was produced
- ⚠ Risk signals combined (diminishing returns): 68% (overlapping signals add less and less)
- = Final 68% (the larger of the two, capped at 100% · the weights are human-set)
Risk signals (probability contribution)
The operator can mint additional tokens, inflating the supply without limit and diluting the value you hold.
⚖️ In projects that keep distributing rewards or airdrops, this is a common design. Even so, the fact that the privilege exists is unchanged, and the risk does not disappear.
A blacklist function can block specific wallets from trading, so sells can be blocked at will.
Owner powers are still active, so the owner-only functions listed above can actually be exercised.
⚖️ In projects that keep distributing rewards or airdrops, this is a common design. Even so, the fact that the privilege exists is unchanged, and the risk does not disappear.
The liquidity (LP) is not locked, so the operator can pull the liquidity in a rug pull.
🟢 Positive signals (Green Flags)
These are observed facts, not approvals — appearing on a listing or data service means a profile exists there, not that anyone vetted the project.
A static check found no sell-blocking configuration. This reflects a code/configuration check, not an actual trade run — cross-checking via a real sell simulation is shown separately as the 'second-source cross-check' item.
No single wallet monopolizes the supply, so the risk of a single dump is small.
⚖️ However, this metric looks only at the single largest wallet — one party splitting holdings across several wallets lowers each share and can look distributed.
Web reputation & whitepaper check (optional · about 10s)
The score above is based on on-chain indicators. This button searches the public web now for scam allegations and whitepaper content (no re-run of the on-chain check). Web search is paid and slow, so we do not run it automatically on every token — only manually when needed. Once run, the result is saved and shown automatically from then on. Web allegations are not conclusions, so verify them directly.
Liquidity & volume (for rug-risk judgment · not a price/value assessment)
Main pair (deepest pool) liquidity $37,864 (raydium) · the totals combine every pair on this chain · View pool ↗
⚠ Note the two different bases: the risk score and signals are computed from the main pair alone, while the figures above are the sum of all pairs. A low main-pair pool can therefore raise a "very low liquidity" signal even when the combined total looks large.
Community rating (for reference · not in the score)
Loading…
This estimate is as of the assessment time — a token's state can change at any moment · Method · Grade criteria