#timmythetoaster Timmy
a788oktKgqmoZUQvLyxPN95sDWE7Wpu7hyPNmGDxfun
a788oktK…GDxfun
Of the 43,875 tokens we have inspected, 85% score a higher risk than this coin. — This is a relative position within the sample we inspected, which was built by deliberately hunting scams and rugs, so it is not a general market distribution. A ranking is not a statement of safety.
This assessment is an uncalibrated estimate of fraud patterns — not a price or investment judgment. Request a correction
Contract safety
No signalsIdentity / impersonation
No signalsAxis cards show where signals are, not a per-axis score — the %p contribution is a simple sum, while the actual combine uses diminishing returns (overlaps add less).
This only means no sell-block signals were observed at inspection time. 2 indicator(s) remain unverified, and upgrades or owner actions can change the state at any time.
Observation history (13 observations · 07/10 ~ 10/14 · source: our own observation snapshots)
Score history (days with a score in the last 90 days: 11 · dates in KST)
The last public score computed each day.
Values by date
| Date (KST) | Public score |
|---|---|
| 2026-10-14 | 14% |
| 2026-10-10 | 14% |
| 2026-10-07 | 14% |
| 2026-09-25 | 13% |
| 2026-09-18 | 13% |
| 2026-09-07 | 13% |
| 2026-08-31 | 13% |
| 2026-08-15 | 13% |
| 2026-08-14 | 13% |
| 2026-08-12 | 13% |
| 2026-07-24 | 13% |
This General token has an estimated scam risk of about 14% (grade A). The main risk signals include Supply concentrated in a few wallets. 5 positive signals were also found. This is an uncalibrated estimate and not investment advice.
How this score was produced
- Risk signals combined (diminishing returns): 14% (overlapping signals add less and less)
- = Final 14% (the larger of the two, capped at 100% · weights are set by the operator and tested on past cases before any change)
Risk signals (probability contribution)
A few wallets monopolize the supply, so a single sell-off could collapse the price.
Positive signals (Green Flags)
These are observed facts, not approvals — appearing on a listing or data service means a profile exists there, not that anyone vetted the project.
Ownership was transferred to a burn address, so no one can call owner-only functions such as minting or pausing.
No additional tokens can be minted, so there is no supply-dilution risk.
A static check found no sell-blocking configuration. This reflects a code/configuration check, not an actual trade run — cross-checking via a real sell simulation is shown separately as the 'second-source cross-check' item.
There is no function to arbitrarily block specific wallets from trading.
A profile for this token exists on major coin-data services. Being listed is not being vetted and is not evidence of safety — it does not mean anyone reviewed or approved the project, and widely listed coins have collapsed before.
Web reputation & whitepaper check (optional · about 10s)
The score above is based on on-chain indicators. This button searches the public web now for scam allegations and whitepaper content (no re-run of the on-chain check). Web search is paid and slow, so we do not run it automatically on every token — only manually when needed. Once run, the result is saved and shown automatically from then on. Web allegations are not conclusions, so verify them directly.
Project info (dev & social)
GitHub not found · X · Telegram · Whitepaper · Homepage
Categories: Solana Ecosystem, Meme, Solana Meme
Profile as of 2026-09-07 — the dev/social figures above were observed at that time and may differ now. (Stale figures are not used in the risk verdict.)
Community rating (for reference · not in the score)
This estimate is as of the assessment time — a token's state can change at any moment · Method · Grade criteria